banjoplayinnerd: (Default)
I was barely aware of Google Voice before yesterday when my sister told me she was using it. It's a service that assigns you a telephone number that in theory will ring through to any set of phones you assign to it. So, I call her Google Voice number and it rings through to her cell phone and her house phone. There are also a bunch of other cool services like caller ID and call blocking. Nifty.

So, I decided to check it out, since I already have a Google account that I'm using for a buncha other things. I go to the Voice web page, answer a bunch of nosy questions, and it offers to either port my existing number, or let me choose a phone number by area code, or zip, or location, or by searching for a word.

Fair enough. I want to keep the cell number I have now, so let's give searching a try, since that is after all supposed to be Google's strength. Give me a 206 (Seattle metro) number, I request.

"No results returned for this search."

OK, how about Seattle?

"No results returned for this search."

Oof. Um, King County?

"No results again, fool."

What about Washington?

That produced results; unfortunately they were all for the other Washington.

Let's search for a word then. How about "Creede"? Nope.

Wait a minute. What about . . . "banjo"?

All right. Now we're getting somewhere. Voice returned a set of five numbers, all of which were of the form 50B-ANJ-Oxxx. Not really what I wanted. I was more looking for something of the form (xxx) xxB-ANJO.

So, on to the next page . . . and I hit pay dirt. The mother lode. Option number three, a phone number in the greater Los Angeles area code, is a keeper. I need to get it on business cards and pass it around to all my friends:

The world can now reach me by dialing 3-2345-BANJO.

(OK, that's really 323-452-2656, but I'm never going to remember that, and neither are you, and neither is anyone else.)
banjoplayinnerd: (Default)
There's this guy in New Zealand named Geoff. He's a radio ham, and his callsign is ZL3GA. I've never met him, don't know anything about him other than his callsign and what's on his website . . . and that this afternoon he was able to hear my signal at a low average quality, 7400 miles away.

The intersection of computers and ham radio has provided us with the ability to do some very interesting things. One of those is automated signal reporting, sometimes called "reverse beacon." When a ham is off the air (yeah, it happens once in a while) they can leave their equipment on with the software running and it will report any signals they hear back to a central server. You can then query that server to see if anyone has heard you, and how well.

It looks sort of like this:

UTC RX TX Signal Dial Offset DX Bearing
20:16 WB0LCW WA7KPK -15 21076 8 1535 102°
20:16 KC9RNK WA7KPK -20 21076 11 1759 90°
20:16 K6JEB WA7KPK -13 21076 -27 660 177°
20:16 W5JZ WA7KPK -6 21076 70 1694 117°
20:16 AK1P WA7KPK -19 21076 5 710 175°
20:16 KB3X WA7KPK -11 21076 16 2315 95°
20:16 KB9AMG WA7KPK -12 21076 16 1696 88°
20:16 ZL3GA WA7KPK -17 21076 -48 7402 223°
20:16 K0ASK WA7KPK -13 21076 -11 1517 104°

The column headings are a bit cryptic (and shortened from the original), but the relevant columns are "signal", "DX" (short for "distance") and "Bearing." "DX" and "Bearing" are the approximate distance in miles and azimuth, or great circle bearing, from my location in Shoreline. "Signal" is how well the other station is receiving me. Higher is better, with 0 being the best. My -6 to W5JC in Texas is pretty decent. Most of the other stateside signals are average to verging on poor. (-24 is generally considered about the lowest signal that the software can decode.) The big surprise was my signal into New Zealand, which at -17 is below average but still very readable.

This is a great tool for finding out whether my signal is getting out and how well. The fact that I sometimes have Japanese, Australian, New Zealand and Asiatic Russian stations reporting that they can hear me is a Good Thing. I wish I was being heard by more European stations, but right now I'll take what I can get.

Unfortunately sometimes I feel like I have a "politician" station in that my message gets out just fine but I don't hear them very well, or sometimes at all. I have plans to improve on my antenna over the next month or so and it will be interesting to do before-and-after comparisons to see whether the improvements actually improved anything. 

Profile

banjoplayinnerd: (Default)
banjoplayinnerd

May 2014

S M T W T F S
    123
45678 910
111213141516 17
18192021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 4th, 2025 03:45 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios